We report an analysis of Beppe Grillo on why you should say "no" to incenitori.
Incinerators, why not
1. The incineration of toxic waste transforms them into nanoparticles and dioxins
2. Incineration requires substances such as water, lime, bicarbonate, which increase the initial amount of waste
3. Every tonne of waste are produced and 300 kg of flue ash and other solid substances.
- solid ash must be disposed of legally at a landfill for toxic waste, waste extremely most dangerous of the old landfill
- fumes containing 30 kg of fly ash cancer, 25 kg of plaster
- incineration produces 650 kg of contaminated water to be purified
4. The micro dust (2 pm to 0.1 pm) from the incineration if inhaled into the lungs to the blood coming in 60 seconds and 60 minutes every other organ in
5. The diseases are caused by the inhalation cancer, birth defects, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, heart attack and stroke. The proof
thousands of scientific papers
Incinerators, why not
1. The incineration of toxic waste transforms them into nanoparticles and dioxins
2. Incineration requires substances such as water, lime, bicarbonate, which increase the initial amount of waste
3. Every tonne of waste are produced and 300 kg of flue ash and other solid substances.
- solid ash must be disposed of legally at a landfill for toxic waste, waste extremely most dangerous of the old landfill
- fumes containing 30 kg of fly ash cancer, 25 kg of plaster
- incineration produces 650 kg of contaminated water to be purified
4. The micro dust (2 pm to 0.1 pm) from the incineration if inhaled into the lungs to the blood coming in 60 seconds and 60 minutes every other organ in
5. The diseases are caused by the inhalation cancer, birth defects, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, heart attack and stroke. The proof
thousands of scientific papers
6. Incinerators, also called energy plants have been financed with 7% of the renewable energy bill Enel associating together waste oil refineries or coal. Without such a tax would be diseconomies. In the last Budget has been approved for financing, but only to incinerators already built
7. In Italy there are 51 incinerators, it would be desirable to have controllers that analyze the concentration of micro dust for each of them, along with the increase of related diseases in the territory in the long run
7. In Italy there are 51 incinerators, it would be desirable to have controllers that analyze the concentration of micro dust for each of them, along with the increase of related diseases in the territory in the long run
8. The oil companies, manufacturers of incinerators and partially funded by the light of day these economic realities are the only beneficiaries of waste incineration
Waste reduction, recycling, recycling and bioessicazione
Waste reduction, recycling, recycling and bioessicazione
1. Waste reduction (Berlin, for example, has reduced the waste in six months, 50%)
2. Separate collection from door to door price timely
2. Separate collection from door to door price timely
3. Recycling of separately collected as
4. The remainder of waste after the implementation of the first three points to be sent to plants for a mechanical selection of the types of the remaining mixed waste. The non-recyclable can be handled without burning it in with plants bioessicazione
5. In economic terms should not burn in the presence of a collection because:
- the wood can be sold to companies to make chipboard
- paper recycling energy that makes it possible to obtain
- plastic recycling is convenient. It takes 2 / 3 kg of oil to make one kg of plastic
6. The collection can be up to 70% of the waste, the remaining 30% can be reduced to 15-20% after bioessicazione.
an amount that is less than or equal to the waste incinerators. But it is inert and not toxic at lower operating costs and environmental impacts health. If
in the waste sector there were no current realities, by law, all private monopolies of public capital, but a real market liberalization, competition between companies would be on the resilience and incineration would be exceeded.
www.beppegrillo.it
4. The remainder of waste after the implementation of the first three points to be sent to plants for a mechanical selection of the types of the remaining mixed waste. The non-recyclable can be handled without burning it in with plants bioessicazione
5. In economic terms should not burn in the presence of a collection because:
- the wood can be sold to companies to make chipboard
- paper recycling energy that makes it possible to obtain
- plastic recycling is convenient. It takes 2 / 3 kg of oil to make one kg of plastic
6. The collection can be up to 70% of the waste, the remaining 30% can be reduced to 15-20% after bioessicazione.
an amount that is less than or equal to the waste incinerators. But it is inert and not toxic at lower operating costs and environmental impacts health. If
in the waste sector there were no current realities, by law, all private monopolies of public capital, but a real market liberalization, competition between companies would be on the resilience and incineration would be exceeded.
www.beppegrillo.it
0 comments:
Post a Comment